BANNED
Home/Guides/Australia Social Media Ban — Kids Phone

THE BAN IS LIVE.
NOW WHAT DO KIDS
ACTUALLY USE?

Australia's under-16 social media ban took effect December 2025. It solved one problem and exposed another. Here is what parents are doing now — and what actually fills the gap.

Online Safety Act 2024 Active December 2025 $49.5M Penalties Updated April 2026

The Legislation

WHAT THE SOCIAL MEDIA BAN
ACTUALLY SAYS

The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 passed Australia's Parliament in November 2024 and took effect in December 2025. It is the most significant piece of children's digital safety legislation in the world at this scale.

Under the Act, social media platforms designated by the eSafety Commissioner are required to take reasonable steps to prevent children under 16 from creating or holding accounts. The enforcement obligation sits on the platforms — not on parents, schools, or children. Platforms that fail to comply face civil penalties of up to $49.5 million for systemic failures.

Australia is the first major Western democracy to mandate platform-level age verification for social media. The UK and EU have similar measures in development, and Australia's legislation has been watched closely by governments in both regions as a potential model.

Platform Coverage

Instagram
Banned under-16
TikTok
Banned under-16
Snapchat
Banned under-16
Facebook
Banned under-16
X (Twitter)
Banned under-16
YouTube
Not designated (Apr 2026)
WhatsApp
Not designated (Apr 2026)
Discord
Under review
Reddit
Designated, enforcing

The ban addresses platforms, not devices. A child with a smartphone and no social media accounts still has access to a browser, YouTube, online gaming, and any workaround a search engine can find.

The Gap

THE PROBLEM THE BAN
DID NOT SOLVE

Before the ban, millions of Australian children used social media — Instagram DMs, Snapchat streaks, TikTok duets — as their primary communication infrastructure. Group chats. Weekend plans. After-school check-ins. The social layer of childhood had migrated onto these platforms, and parents largely knew it was happening.

The ban removed that layer. What it did not replace was the communication need underneath it. Children still need to make plans. Still need to talk to friends. Still need a way to reach their parents, and a way for parents to reach them.

The instinct of many parents, post-ban, was to hand their child a phone — even a basic one — so communication could continue. But even basic phones come with browsers. Most feature phones include WiFi. The boundary between "just a phone" and "an access point to everything the ban was trying to address" is not as clear as it appears.

This is the gap the ban exposed. Not a shortage of devices. A shortage of devices that genuinely do only what a phone should do.

READY TO TRY YAPS?

The first WiFi home phone built for Australian families.

Join the Waitlist
"Taking away Instagram does not tell you what to give back."
Parent community thread, Mumsnet Australia, January 2026
NEXT

The Shift

WHAT AUSTRALIAN PARENTS
ARE DOING NEXT

Since December 2025, Australian parent communities have been navigating the post-ban landscape. A few distinct patterns have emerged.

Delaying smartphones entirely. The Wait Mate movement — which existed before the ban but gained significant new traction after it — asks parents to delay smartphones until at least Year 7 as a coordinated community commitment. The ban gave this movement a moment: if platforms are legislatively off-limits anyway, the case for a smartphone at age 9 or 10 becomes significantly weaker.

Moving to dumb phones. Feature phones without app stores saw increased interest from parents of children aged 10–14 who still needed mobile capability. The Nokia 3210 (2024 reissue) and Alcatel 1 both saw strong sales in Australia in early 2026.

Reconsidering the device category entirely. The ban surfaced a question many parents had not previously asked: does my child actually need a mobile phone, or do they need a phone? The distinction matters. A phone that makes calls does not require a SIM card, a data plan, or a browser. A WiFi home phone meets the communication need for younger children without any of the exposure risk the ban was designed to address.

The ban created an opening. Parents are not just removing platforms — they are rethinking what the device should be in the first place.

The Alternatives

WHAT ACTUALLY FILLS THE GAP
FOR AUSTRALIAN KIDS

Four categories of device are available to Australian families navigating the post-ban landscape. Each serves a different age range and risk appetite.

WIFI HOME PHONES

Best for ages 5 — 12

A physical phone that connects to home WiFi for voice calls only. No screen, no browser, no apps, no SIM. Parent-managed contact list. The child picks up the handset and calls — that is all it does. The safest option for younger children and the most direct alignment with the intent of the social media ban: connection without exposure. Yaps is the Australian option in this category.

DUMB PHONES

Best for ages 10 — 14

Feature phones with calling and SMS, no app store. Most modern feature phones include a basic browser and WiFi, so they are not entirely internet-free. Better than a smartphone for this age group, but require a SIM and mobile plan. Popular choices include Nokia 3210 (2024 reissue) and Alcatel 1.

KIDS SMARTWATCHES

Best for ages 6 — 12

Wearable devices (Spacetalk, DokiWatch) combining calling, GPS, and SOS. Good for families where location monitoring matters. Monthly plan required. Useful complement to a home phone for children with independence outside the house. Some models include messaging.

MANAGED SMARTPHONES

Best for ages 13 — 16

A standard smartphone with parental control software (Bark, Qustodio, Family Link). The ban removes social media but the device still provides full internet access. Most appropriate for 13+ when the communication and social needs that require a smartphone emerge. Requires ongoing parental management.

See every option compared in full →

Where Yaps Fits

THE DEVICE DESIGNED FOR
EXACTLY THIS MOMENT

Yaps was designed before the social media ban passed — but it was designed for the same problem the ban is trying to solve. The question was: what can a young child use to call home and call their friends, without being handed a portal to the internet?

The answer was a WiFi home phone. No SIM. No screen beyond what shows the contact list. No browser. No app store. No camera. A handset that looks like a phone from before the internet existed — because for the purpose it serves, that is exactly what it should be.

Yaps connects to your home WiFi. You log into a web portal on your own phone or computer, add the contacts your child should be able to reach — grandparents, close family friends, their best mate from school — and you are done. Your child picks up the phone, sees the list of contacts, and calls. The call is a real voice call — the same quality as a normal phone call, because it uses the same VoIP technology that powers business phone systems around the world.

The Australian social media ban removed the platforms. Yaps is the device that was always the right answer for the years when those platforms were never appropriate in the first place.

The ban is for under-16s. Yaps is for under-12s. The overlap is not a coincidence — it is the gap where the right device was always missing.

Read the Wait Mate guide →

What makes a phone safe for kids? →

Common Questions

FREQUENTLY ASKED
QUESTIONS

What is Australia's social media ban for kids?

The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 took effect December 2025. It requires social media platforms to prevent under-16s from creating accounts. Designated platforms include Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook, and X. Penalties of up to $49.5 million apply for non-compliance. Enforcement sits on platforms, not parents.

Does the ban cover WhatsApp and YouTube?

WhatsApp and YouTube were not included in the initial designated services list. As of April 2026 they are not covered by the ban, though both are under review. Many parents are using the spirit of the legislation — reducing algorithmic platform exposure — as reason to reconsider smartphone access more broadly.

What phone should my child use after the social media ban?

The ban addresses platforms, not devices. The most common alternatives: WiFi home phones (Yaps) for under-12s who need home communication without internet access; basic feature phones for children who need mobile capability; kids smartwatches for GPS and calling. The right choice depends on your child's age and how much independence they have outside the home.

Can my child still contact friends after the ban?

Yes. The ban removes social media accounts, not communication capability. Phone calls and direct messaging apps outside the designated category remain available. For younger children, a WiFi home phone allows calling approved contacts without internet access. For older children, a basic phone with calling and SMS provides communication without social media.

What are the penalties for platforms that don't comply?

Up to $49.5 million for systemic failures to prevent under-16s from creating accounts. The eSafety Commissioner has the authority to investigate platform compliance, issue notices, and pursue civil penalties. The legislation was designed to make compliance the economically rational choice for platforms.

YAPS

THE ANSWER THAT
WAS ALWAYS RIGHT.

No screen. No SIM. No internet. Just voice calls to the people you trust. Join the founding families waitlist.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keep Reading

RELATED GUIDES

THE BAN IS HERE. NOW WHAT?

Our original deep-dive on the social media ban — the legislation, the gap it created, and the alternatives parents are choosing.

THE WAIT MATE GUIDE

How the parent-led movement to delay smartphones is reshaping childhood in Australia.

WHAT MAKES A PHONE SAFE FOR KIDS?

A practical framework for evaluating any device your child might use.